Germany At A Glance, January 2008

Welcome to the German Economy Watch Blog. Below you will find the normal chronological blog posts. But first we would like to present some charts which provide background data and which we hope will help the first time reader better assess and get to grips with the argument being presented here. The big question which arose concerning the Germany economy in 2007 was whether or not the new found dynamism in German economic activity constituted some form of remaissance, and formed part of a global decoupling process whereby a sustainable recovery in domestic demand was taking place. Analysts on this blog never really accepted this view. The key question and central enigma associated with the German economy is really why domestic demand should have remained so congenitally weak over such a considerable period of time. Since this phenomenon is also to be observed in the the two other societes with very high (circa 43) population median ages - Italy and Japan - we postulate that demographics and population ageing processes offer some part of the explanation here. Basically what we can observe as societies move above the 40 median age mark are a number of stylised facts. Weakness in domestic private consumption would be one of these, absence of consumer credit driven property booms would be another, growing pressure on the national debt as the elderly dependence ratio steadily rises would be another, and growing dependence on export growth for sustaining GDP growth would be the central feature of the whole edifice. We hope you will find the background data presented here useful in assessing the argument which we are presenting on this blog, which is basically that a key component in the longer term growth stagnation from which Germany is suffering has its roots in the underlying demographics. Basically and in the long run (possibly with a 30 year lag) fertility does matter. Please click on thumbnails for better viewing.

What now follows which will be a very rough and ready attempt to describe in broad brush strokes how the contemporary German economy actually works. First off, and as is well known, German society is ageing, and at the same time the German population has started declining. Not only is Germany's median age rising, the proportion of the population in the key 25-49 age group is now falling.

As can be seen from the chart this crucial age group touched its highpoint in 1997/98. This could be thought of as the moment of maximum capacity for the German economy since it includes the crucial 25 to 40 household-former, first-time-homebuyer group. In terms of credit expansion, it is this group which drives a significant part of internal demand.

The age group also includes another important group, the 35 to 50 years one. This group drives an economy in productive terms, since these are the prime age workers. If you think of a society as a 100 metres sprint athlete, then there is an age when this athlete is at the maximum of his or her running potential, an age after which each time they can only run the 100 metres more slowly.


Well a society is the same in terms of its collective economic potential, without addressing underlying issues either through fertility or immigration, it can only move forward more and more slowly. Consumption becomes flat, and GDP growth - gioven the external dependence - fragile.


Private consumption has hovered pretty close to the 60% mark for many years now, while government consumption - after moving sharply upwards as a total share in the first half of the 1970s has subsequently remained pretty constant, moving around the 19% of GDP mark. The big difference has been in the importance of fixed capital formation (GFCF) which reached from 1975 to 2000hovered around the 22 - 24% of GDP mark.

Prior to 1975 GFCF was at a much higher level, while post 2000 it has dropped substantially And So what we can see is that the year between, say, 1975 and 2000, when GFCF remaind a more or less constant share of GDP, constituted - to use the language of neo-classical economics - the constant growth period of the German domestic economy.The years prior to 1975 were the convergence, or "catch-up" years


And especially the 1960s, after Germany finally broke out of the destruction and devastation of WWII - while the years after 2000 constitute what the neo-classicists would call the "balanced growth period", although as we can see, it isn't very balanced, and there certainly isn't a steady state.


2008 Forecasts: There is a consenus at the present time that the German economy is slowing. Where there is no real consensus is over the rate at which it is slowing and where and when it will settle. It is clear that GDP growth in 2007 will be below the heady 3.1% annual rate achieved in 2006. The OECD last December revised their 2007 German forecast down to 2.6%, and their 2008 one down to 1.8%. The IMF in their October World Economic Outlook forecast growth for 2007 at 2.4%, slowing to 2% in 2008. Morgan Stanley's Elga Bartsch, while optimistic that the German economy will whether the credit crunch better than most (and here she may well be right) is somewhat more sanguine, putting 2008 growth at 1.5%. In general though I rather doubt her overview that "Germany could well be on the way to becoming the new growth locomotive in Europe." and especially her suggestion that "the phase of underperformance in terms of GDP growth, which has plagued Europe’s largest economy for years, is clearly over." Unfortunately, what we are arguing on this blog is that Germany's GDP growth rates since the mid 1990s are not some special kind of "underperformance", but what can be expected from a society with a rapidly rising median age which is increasingly dependent on exports rather than domestic consumption for growth.

The EU commission in it's November 2007 forecast was also convinced that the German economy was now on a "solid growth path", forecasting 2.5% growth for 2007 and 2.1% for 2008. I personally will be very surprised if we see growth in the region of 2% for the German economy in 2008, and I even consider the 1.8% from the OECD and 1.5% from Morgan Stanley still on the high side given the extent of downside risk. Basically the reasonably favourable depreciation rules which currently apply to German investment have been changed as of 1 January 2008, and we might reasonably expect to see some sort of impact on investment comparable with the negative shock which hit private domestic consumption following the VAT rise on 1 Jan 2007. In addition all the indications suggest that German consumption will continue to be weak in 2008. So if consumer consumption is at best flat, governemnt consumption equally so, and investment and construction weakening, we are simply lefy with export growth, and here the outlook is definitely more negative in 2008 than it was in 2007. The Spanish economy (one important German customer) is visibly wilting by the day, as is the UK (another big customer), but it is to Eastern Europe we must look for the biggest impact on German exports of any correction in 2008. Just one data point should suffice, Germany exports roughly the same value of goods to the Czech Republic (and more to Poland) as it does to China. This means that Geramny is proportionately not that exposed to any slowdown in China, but hugely exposed to any sudden shift in growth and demand in the East of Europe.

So I would say, that on current data, 1% growth in Germany in 2008 look a reasonable estimate at this point, but that this needs to be taken to mean with considerable downside risk. Germany is now tremendously dependent on what happens elsewhere, and until what does actually happen elsewhere becomes clearer it is difficult to be more precise on Germany. The only apparent bright spot on the horizon is employment, but I am dubious that in the context of Germany's ageing workforce this will work through as some are hoping, as I expain at some considerable length in this post here. My opinion is that Germany will enter recession at some point during 2008, and that we may well have 2 consecutive quarters of negative growth. The continuing high euro will maintain pressure on German exports, and high oil and food prices will maintain pressure on the inflation front, at least in the first half of 2008. The ECB will probably switch stance towards rate reductions at some point, but since, as Elga Bartsch among many others so eloquently argues German internal consumption and investment are not especially dependent on credit conditions, easing from the ECB may not have as much impact as one would hope for.

Key Posts For Understanding The Present Path of the German Economy
Is The German Economy Heading For Recession in 2008?
Employment and Unemployment in Germany January 2008
Germany Economy, What Price the VAT Effect Now!
The German Economy, Employment, Export Shares and Age Structure
Structural Aspects of German Export Dependence
Does NeoClassical Steady State Growth Really Exist?

Saturday, December 15, 2007

Is The German Economy Heading For Recession in 2008?

Well with most commentators now assuming a 40% minimum probability that we will get a US recession in 2008 (I personally really wouldn't want to quantify the risk here, and think, along with MacroMan that the US may even surprise us on the upside), and With Morgan Stanley's Takehiro Sato (closely accompanied by our very own Claus Vistesen) now calling some sort of recession for Japan in 2008 (and see this morning's Tankan, and in this case I would not only go along with the consensus, but even fear that the downside risks may exceed everyone's expectations) perhaps it is time to ask ourselves what the odds are for a recession in the Eurozone in 2008?

And what better vantage point to look at this from than that of the zone's largest economy, the German one.

ZEW Plummets

First off the sentiment indexes. These have been trawling negative territory for some time now (see the IFO here and the GFK consumer index here), and this week we learned that investor confidence in Germany reached its lowest level in almost 15 years, as rising credit costs dimmed the outlook for economic growth. The Mannheim-based ZEW Center for European Economic Research said its index of investor and analyst expectations fell to minus 37.2, the lowest since January 1993, from minus 32.5 last month.




InterBank Rates

The cost to banks of borrowing euros over a three month period rose to its highest level since December 2000 this week as banks are hoarding cash to cover their commitments over year-end. The euro interbank offered rate, the amount banks charge each other for these loans, rose 3 base points to 4.93 percent, according to the European Banking Federation. That's 93 base points more than the European Central Bank's benchmark rate. If we look at the latest available data from the British Banking Association we will see that the three month euro Libor rate turned up once again in mid November, and has not stopped rising since.



It is important to realise here that this movement in the 3 month libor that have been seeing since the start of August has taken place without any change in interest rates at the ECB. But these rates will affect all those borrowers who are on variable interest rates tied to Euribor (or Mibor) and, for example, nearly 80% of mortgage holders in Spain fall into this category, so a sharp monetary tightening is now taking place, even as general economic conditions deteriorate.

Growth in Germany is expected by virtually everybody to slow next year, although no-one really knows by how much, and downside risks abound. A drop to a 2008 overall rate of 1.7 percent was forecast by the RWI economics group last week, but even this may be on the optimistic side.



German Exports

Meanwhile German exports unexpectedly rose in October, pushing the trade surplus to a record.



Still, the euro's 11 percent advance against the dollar this year is making German exports less competitive abroad, adding to concerns that this continued export strength may not be sustainable. Exports were the driving force behind last year's 2.9 percent economic expansion, which was the fastest in six years. And if we come to look at the evolution of the year on year growth rates in exports (which is the key data point I would argue), we can see that the trend is now definitely down, and indeed that the export component in this present expansion probably peaked sometime in the last quarter of last year.


So what can we expect from this. Well it may be worth reminding ourselves about what happened last time round, ie last time the acceleration in the Y-o-Y growth rates in German exports effectively stalled. That was back in early 2000, as we can see from the chart below. And what happened at that time? Well the fed was easing as the US entered recession, and the euro was to some extent rising, both of which put a strong break on German exports. So it isn't the rise in the currency alone that matters, you have to think about the whole environment which produces it. Why your currency is rising, while someone else's is falling. And of course, in German export terms, after the rise comes the fall. This is the cost of not being able to depend on your own internal demand, you have to depend on someone else's demand.




As we can see once the rate of increase in annual exports entered real decline, GDP was not far behind, and off Germany went into recession. So this time round the same thing may well happen, and domestic demand may well not offset any fall-off in foreign sales as oil-driven inflation and rising borrowing costs steadily sap German consumer and corporate spending power. Last month, consumer prices rose 3.3 percent from a year ago, the most since records began in 1996. The price of oil has gained 44 percent this year. At the same time German wages, as is well known have had only very weak increases in recent years.




Looking into the situation a bit more deeply, we can see that the construction and housing sectors are in long term decline in terms of their importance in the German economy. If we leave out the very exceptional quarters associated with the pre VAT rise construction boom (Q4 2006 and Q1 2007), housing simply hasn't turned back up since the end of the boom in 1995. As I keep saying I think the strongest explanation for this is the demographic one, and it is this element that those who keep hoping against hope to get a turnround in German domestic demand simply are not seeing.




If we now move on to look at the co-movement in German GDP and some of its key components - movements in GDP growth compared with growth in exports and growth in housing - we can see that every time the rate of increase in exports slows (the green line in the chart below), GDP (the red one) follows it down. And at the moment, of course, the rate of export increase is slowing. If we then add to this what is happening in housing and construction, where we have a very rapid decline from the VAT-rise-provoked-boom (houses also went up 3% on 1 January 2007), and the deteriorating external environment, it isn't at all clear to me at this point that we won't see a German recession in 2008, in fact I would put the odds on a German recession slighly higher than the 40% probability most people are attaching to a recession in the US (let's say 50-50).



Now, as I keep indicating, the backdrop to the whole situation in Germany is the vulnerability of domestic consumption, and quite how fragile all this is has been brought home by the boom-bust type dynamic produced by last January's VAT hike, which I think can be clearly seen in the data from the last quarter of of 2006 onwards. There is a huge spike, and then there are 3 quarters of negative growth.



Of course, demographic ageing is not only about rising median age, it is also about continuous changes in the population structure, and in particular the proportion of the population in the key 25-49 age group rises to a peak and then starts to fall. Let's look at this chart for Germany:



As can be seen this crucial age group touched its highpoint in 1997/98, precisely around the time that the mid 1990s boom in construction came to an end.This could be imagined as the moment of maximum capacity for the German economy as a whole. In closing I would wish to point out that I am not trying to draw all this to people's attention in order to criticise, or in some way have a go at Germany. Au contraire. It is because I am concerned that I am going to all this trouble. The first step to getting to grips with and fixing a problem has to be recognising that it exists. That drop in fertility that happened deep in the past, may now seem like a long forgotten event, but its presence is forever with us. Something obviously needs to be done, and better late than never. Putting all your eggs in one basket is never the best of ideas.

The Great VAT Rise Scandal

I think the chart I have just presented showing the recent evolution of German private consumption really speaks for itself. I created it as I was going through the detailed data for German Q3 2007 GDP. So some of the things you were taught in Econ 101 do turn out to be more or less valid, despite what a whole battery of people who should have known better (from the FT to the Economist among many others) were telling you not so long ago. You can't raise prices without having some effect on underlying demand. And when you tell people you are going to raise them in advance, then you should expect them to stock up as best they can. So we get a big spike in private consumption at the end of 2006, and then 3 quarters of year on year negative consumption growth. I'm not sure after this experience people will be piling ageing society costs onto already fragile domestic consumption again. (NB, I do hope they are looking at this data in Japan, where, of course they are currently discussing the advisability of introducing a consumption tax to try to reduce the scale of the accumulated government debt they have - around 150% of GDP).

But the problem with this VAT rise isn't only the impact it is now having on German internal consumption, it is also making its effect felt in the legacy it is leaving policymakers to get to grips with. In particular we can, of course, notice the impact of the rise on Germany's short term inflation dynamics (with many observers suggesting it has contributed around 1.3% points to Germany's current inflation spike - to which we will now turn) and in this way the earlier VAT decision has considerably constrained the ECB's room for manouevre in the face of the sub-prime housing shock.


Inflation on the Rise

So, and just to make things really complicated for the ECB, German inflation accelerated in November to the fastest pace in 12 years, led by surging oil and food costs, and the knock-on VAT effect.



German consumer prices - as measured by the harmonized European Union index, rose 3.3 percent from a year earlier in November, following a 2.7 percent increase in October, according to this weeks data from the Federal Statistics Bureau. That's the fastest monthly rate to be recorded since harmonized data for Germany started being collated in January 1996. In the month of November prices rose by 0.5 percent.

While the wage response to the price pressure is likely to be moderate, the inflation squeeze following on the back of the VAT hike is likely to weaken an already weak domestic consumption even further, and in the absence of some strong monetary easing I think the result is not too hard to predict.




If we now take a look at the breakdown in Q3 German GDP growth in terms of the component contributions, it isn't hard to see that the heavy lifting was carried out by exports, and these were followed in importance by machinery and equipment investment (which to some extent is related to export needs). So if external conditions deteriorate, even slightly - which all the forecasts suggest they will for 2008 - then Germany will have increasing difficulty maintaining the pace of the export expansion. Remember, for Germany to fall into recession we don't need to see negative export growth, just a substantial reduction in the rate of increase.


Conclusions

To end up more or less where we started, below is the chart for the percentage point contributions of private domestic consumption to GDP growth in Germany in recent quarters. As can be seen, during the three last quarters (following the VAT anticipation spurt) consumption has acted as a drag on growth. With inflation now biting into consumers pockets, and monetary conditions effectively tightening, this position is more than likely going to deteriorate.



All of this has, as I am saying, put the ECB in something of a double-bind straightjacket. It is difficult for them to raise rates in the short term. In which case the Fed is likely to continue easing, and the relative yield offered by European rates will rise, and with them, in all possibility, the euro. So one of the factors in the mechanism has to be the different response rates of the two central banks involved. The Fed tends to respond more rapidly and more aggressively when iit sees problems coming. So it we look at the chart below for the movements in interest rates by the 2 insitutions since the second half of 2000 we can see that the fed started resacting last time tround a full six months before the ECB. as a result by mid 2001 Federal reserve rates were below ECB ones. So what happened then?

Well, if you look at the chart below you will see, the euro started to rise against the dollar (the yield differential factor). The rise really got going at the start of 2002 and lasted till the spring of 2005. And what was happening at this point, well the Federal Reserve rate was once more back above the ECB one, and the differential was rising, that's what happened. And what happened to German GDP during 2002, 2003, and 2004? GDP growth was at a very low, near recessionary level, that's what happened. Go back and look at the export growth GDP chart, the fit isn't perfect, but there is obviously a very strong relationship.


Now I am obviously not suggesting that what happened to German GDP after 2002 is an entirely relative interest rates story, the slump in world growth following the internet bust is also a very important part of the picture (as are the cosequences of the sub-prime generated credit crunch this time round), but interest rates and relative exchange rates do form part of the picture, and provide an interesting part of the narrative. So basically we have a cyclical sub-mechanism at work based on the ECBs ability to get things wrong (or work itself into a corner), where by the delayed reaction from the ECB leads the euro to rise to unrealistic levels, and this rise eventually pinches German export growth (German enterprises may be a lot better at reacting than the ECB, but their elasticity is not infinite, there is a limit). And when the limit is hit, then off goes Germany into recession, and usually these days this means something more than just two quarters of negative growth.

And why is Germany structurally condemned to depend on exports, well the principal reason is the rising median age. And what drives the rising median age? Well a number of factors are involved, but the most important of them is fertility. And so I present you with what is possibly the most preoccupying graph of all, the one thats shows the stubborn resistance of the German TFR to any upward movement.


Basically then I rest my case. The danger of recession in Germany as we enter 2008 is at greater than 50%.

1 comments:

beletjoya said...

I agree. Genau!Look at China More people, more consumers, more workers, more products and more money. Exportation is just their excess products.Asia is booming because we have people, we have consumers and we are learning the technology.
-Dra. Maria Isabelita A. Joya
Dermatologist-Beauty
Industry Importer